Home > 2.5 Election campaign > UKRAINE - Joint Opinion on the Draft Amendments to the Laws on Election of People's Deputies and on the Central Election Commission and on the Draft Law on Repeat Elections of Ukraine
 
 
 
Download file    
 
 
Paragraph 74
 

III. Comments on the Text on the Draft Electoral Law 


H. Election campaign


The OSCE/ODIHR final report on the 2012 parliamentary elections provides a lengthy list of examples of the abuse of state resources in the elections. This list includes examples of: “the use of official events, meetings, or public works to promote the party or its candidates; the active participation of local or regional officials in candidate meetings during working hours; public workers being required to attend meetings with candidates; newspapers or websites of regional or local authorities containing materials in support of candidates or attacking the opposition; and planned rallies or meetings of opposing candidates being denied, cancelled or otherwise obstructed without a justifiable reason.”[1] This occurred despite the general requirement in Article 11 of the current electoral law that the election process provide for the “unbiased treatment of parties”.


[1] See OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report on the 28 October parliamentary elections, page 16.