Furthermore, the notification of a preliminary conclusion would not appear to be necessary to obtain the opinions of the President and the Jogorku Kenesh on the respective cases at hand because both of them may express their views during the general proceedings before the Chamber. As a consequence, the additional exchange of views introduced by the Draft Amendments would not relate to new legal arguments but, on the other hand, would threaten to politicize the proceedings before the Chamber. Furthermore, the period of three months given to the President and the Jogorku Kenesh for review will significantly delay proceedings before the Chamber and could prevent it from taking actions in urgent proceedings.