Council of Europe
Home > 1.2.2 Equal voting power/constituency delimitation > REPORT ON CONSTITUENCY DELINEATION AND SEAT ALLOCATION
 
 
 
Download file    
 
 
Paragraph 78
 

The issue is to know when inadmissible electoral geometry is at play. Up to what extent is disproportionality acceptable?

 
Members
Albania
Algeria
Andorra
Armenia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Chile
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Kazakhstan
Korea, Republic
Kosovo
Kyrgyzstan
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Mexico
Moldova
Monaco
Montenegro
Morocco
Netherlands
North Macedonia
Norway
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russian Federation (The Russian Federation ceased to be a member on March 23rd, 2022)
San Marino
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Tunisia
Türkiye
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States of America
 
Associate Members
Belarus (suspended on 17 March 2022)
 
Observers
Argentina
Holy See
Japan
Uruguay
 
Special Status
European Union
OSCE/ODIHR
Palestinian National Authority
South Africa
 

Bolivia
Colombia
Cuba
Ecuador
El Salvador
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Nicaragua
Panama
Paraguay
The Dominican Republic
Venezuela

Thank you for using VOTA. In order to help us improve the database, please send your comments or feedback to vota@te.gob.mx or to venice@coe.int

The VOTA database was created within the framework of the joint programme between the Venice Commission and the European Commission "Democracy through free and fair elections". It is managed jointly by the Secretariat of the Venice Commission and by the Mexican Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judiciary (TEPJF).