The draft Law does not enlist in detail the decisions or actions of the election administration that can be challenged. The persons whose electoral rights are violated would benefit from the elaboration of a more detailed list of appealable decisions, actions and inactions. This would make it possible to declare an appeal against the results inadmissible if the violation took place at an earlier stage of the electoral process (registration of voters or candidates, decisions on the opening/non-opening of the polling stations, campaigning and its financing) and did not lead to an immediate appeal. The Venice Commission and ODIHR recommend that the most typical cases of actions, inactions and decisions open to challenge by appeal be (non-exhaustively) listed in the Electoral Code. In addition, the competencies of the ordinary courts and the Constitutional Court adjudicating appeals on the vote counting and other decisions made after the election day should be clarified in order to avoid lack of jurisdiction or parallel competencies and possibilities for the voters and candidates to choose the adjudicating body.