So in the present case in Kyrgyzstan there are two problematic issues: one is an issue of time - how long can the incumbent parliament stay in office after the end of the term? The other one is an issue of powers - what can the Parliament do during the prorogatio period? Under both aspects, the constitutional law approved by the Kyrgyz Parliament on October 22 does not reflect the spirit of genuine democratic principles, although it does not openly violate any explicit constitutional provision: in the first place, the postponement of the elections of the new Parliament until June 2021, gives the Parliament in office 6 to 8 more months of power, which is a long period of time, much longer than the usual few weeks necessary to carry out the electoral activities; secondly, the Parliament in office, during the period of prorogatio, i.e. of diminished powers, has suspended a constitutional law and changed the rules of the democratic game.