Some of the proposed amendments aim to strengthen the election dispute resolution process, apparently in response to the largely ineffective handling of post-election complaints by commissions and courts that led to political and public backlash following the 2020 parliamentary elections. The existing framework for complaints and appeals in the Election Code has been the subject of long-standing and reiterated ODIHR and Venice Commission recommendations to simplify the process; broaden legal standing to ensure that citizens whose electoral rights are violated are entitled to lodge a complaint to seek legal remedy; provide for the right to seek judicial review of all decisions and (in)actions of election bodies and their officials; revise legal deadlines for submission and adjudication of complaints to allow for sufficient time to effectively prepare and adjudicate cases and, at the same time, provide for duly expedited resolution; avoid overly strict rules on complaint admissibility with the aim to assure substantive consideration of all complaints; provide for online submission of complaints to election commissions. Some of the above-noted recommendations are addressed, in whole or in part, by the proposed amendments. However, the need for robust reform of the election dispute resolution process to ensure straight-forward access to timely, transparent, and effective resolution of disputes is not addressed. Such a more comprehensive reform is recommended, at least in the longer term. In this connection, the rapporteurs noted during the videoconferences that several interlocutors stressed the importance of a well-functioning judiciary as a precondition for the effectiveness of the electoral dispute settlement and citizens’ trust in it.