Article 56.3 regulates the procedure after the initiative group has submitted a proposal to the President of the Assembly. If the President of the Assembly considers that the submitted proposal goes against legal requirements concerning its form or content, and the initiative group sticks to the proposal, the proposal shall be put on the agenda of the parliament instantly. While it is legitimate to verify whether the proposal goes against superior law or human rights, there are two risks: 1) that the verification procedure, if politically biased, may delay the parliamentary debate; 2) that a high number of proposals, which may not be serious in nature, be presented for verification only in order to hamper the ordinary work of the parliament as the draft law allows an initiative committee consisting of three persons only. If every proposal has to be added to the agenda of the Assembly unless verified by the speaker, there could be hundreds or even thousands of such proposals, which could paralyse the work of the legislative body. The Venice Commission thus recommends enabling an independent body (such as an election commission) to verify the initiative, with a possible judicial remedy in case the proposal is rejected. The law could provide for a deadline for such verification.