The same logic can be applied to the proposal to eliminate the electoral courts of the states. The number of levels of appeals is another important element to be taken into account for assessing the effectiveness of the remedies regarding electoral disputes. The current model allows for the proximity of the first instance in the resolution of electoral conflicts at the municipal level. Several levels of appeals may be a guarantee for electoral stakeholders. However, for certain types of pre-election disputes, multiple levels of administrative and judicial appeal can potentially disrupt the electoral calendar and create uncertainty. A balance is therefore necessary between an effective remedy and ensuring smooth and continuous electoral processes, i.e. without disruptions endangering the continuity of the electoral cycle as a whole.