The Venice Commission recalls that the legal classification of the offence (in this case probably as administrative) at a domestic level does not exclude its possible "criminal" nature for the Convention purposes. The European Court of Human Rights has developed the so-called “Engel criteria”,24 most recently again summarised in the Vasile Sorin Marin case “[T]he first criterion is the legal classification of the offence under national law, the second is the very nature of the offence and the third is the degree of severity of the penalty that the person concerned risks incurring. The second and third criteria are alternative and not necessarily cumulative. However, this does not exclude a cumulative approach in cases where separate analysis of each criterion does not make it possible to reach a clear conclusion as to the existence of a criminal charge”.25 In the latter case, an administrative fine of around 50 € was considered as punitive in nature and therefore as falling under the criminal limb of Article 6 ECHR. Should the fines imposed by the Code of Administrative Offences be considered as punitive rather than as preventive, it is possible that the measure under Article 30.6 would also fall under the criminal limb of Article 6 ECHR.