If “misconduct in office”, including a breach of electoral law, were considered to be a violation of the Constitution, the law should stipulate in detail what is considered as misconduct, as in most cases the unlawfulness of the application of law can be cured by the election dispute resolution mechanism. Not every misapplication of electoral law should be a ground for potential removal. A different understanding or interpretation of electoral law has to be tolerated within the bounds of reasonableness. Broad and unspecified allegations of unethical behaviour, incompetence, incapacity, non-presence in the meetings of the EMB for a specific period without justifiable reason, or engagement in partisan activities should not lead automatically to the dismissal of the EMB member: such grounds are generally too vague without additional particulars and may lead to unforeseeable or unequal application of the law. Procedural guarantees need to be in place, including the right of the person to submit evidence and appeal the decision before a court, unless the decision is made by the highest-level court.