The Peruvian authorities have submitted that the right of the high officials to question before a judicial instance the parliamentary procedure in case they consider a violation of the due process is always recognized. The Commission observes however that such possibility is not explicitly set forth in the Constitution. As concerns a possible recurso de amparo, the Commission notes that the Constitutional Tribunal has recognised71 that if a parliamentary act directly affects a fundamental right, judicial review of such political act should be possible. However, if it is a pure political act “acto politico puro”, due process does not have the same scope and is admissible only on the form and not the substance: amparo must not empower to substitute for the exercise of competences which are constitutionally reserved to the Congress. A recent amendment of the Code of Constitutional Procedure introduced a special procedure for amparo requests on the question of the exercise of the exclusive attributions and exclusions of the Congress, referred to the election, designation, ratification and removal of senior officials, as well as on those linked to juicio and ante juicio. Precautionary measures and immediate execution of the judgments are not applicable.72 In the Commission’s view, it is not clear whether there is a possibility to challenge the existence of a “constitutional offence” through a recurso de amparo. In addition, the Commission has not been provided with any example of amparo reviews of juicios politicos after March 2024.