The final provisions in Act LXXIX of 2024 deem many of the aforementioned amendments to be cardinal pursuant to various articles of the Fundamental Law.[13] Such cardinal provisions will be subject to special legislation needing two-thirds parliamentary majority to be amended in the future. Some of the amendments deemed cardinal are relatively technical in nature, such as the possibility for election commissions to hold online meetings, procedural issues related to filling the vacancies in various electoral offices, or the remuneration of the deputy president of the National Election Office, to name just a few examples. While stability of the law is crucial to the credibility of the electoral process, it is those rules covering the election system itself, the composition of electoral commissions and the drawing of constituency boundaries that should be particularly safeguarded from political manipulation. Qualified majority is one mechanism to provide for stability and broader consensus. However, other types of electoral provisions should normally have the rank of statute law that can be amended by simple majority. Indeed, rules on implementation, in particular those on technical questions and matters of details, can be in the form of regulations which provide the election administration with the necessary flexibility to respond to obvious needs.^[14] The Venice Commission reminds once again that a too wide use of cardinal laws, which once more took place when adopting the Act, is problematic with regard to both the Constitution and ordinary laws^[15] and recommends reconsidering their use for electoral law provisions of an administrative nature.