For example, according to certain electoral and demographic experts the removal of two constituencies from Budapest – instead of only one – was not justified, and it might favour the governing parties. This move made it necessary to redraw all the Budapest constituencies. Representatives of the opposition claimed that this redrawing was done in a very questionable manner, literally destroying certain constituencies, dividing them into two or more parts. Furthermore, according to demographic experts met by the rapporteurs, in Csongrád-Csanád county the disproportionality of constituencies 1 and 2 has not significantly decreased despite the modification; while the unmodified constituencies of Tolna and Somogy counties maintained a high degree of disproportionality, which favours the governing parties; the Fejér county amendment was a typical case of politically motivated gerrymandering; in a limited number of districts, different techniques of gerrymandering were used, namely cracking, packing and mixing; in sum, the amendments did not comprehensively address the problem of disproportionality, and made it even worse in some cases; and according to these interlocutors it was clear that the districts were drawn not necessarily on the basis of settlement structure, but rather on the basis of electoral geography.[44]