(1) A recommendation shall be valid if

a) the recommending voter had the right to recommend a candidate in the constituency at any time between the day when the recommendation sheet was handed out and the day it was submitted,

b) except for the signature, the recommending voter’s data indicated on the recommendation sheet correspond to his data in the polling district electoral register,

c) the recommendation complies with the requirements referred to in section 122.

(2) It shall not constitute a ground for invalidity

a) if the difference between the data of the recommending voter and the data in the central electoral register or the register of personal data and address of citizens, the register of travel documents or the register of driving licences is caused by any of the following, but the identity of the voter can be established beyond reasonable doubt:

aa) accent error,

ab) spelling difference,

ac) specification of a geographic name in a foreign language,

ad) provision of the data in another language,

ae) omission of one of multiple given names, omission or inclusion of the “dr.” title, inclusion of a junior, senior, widowed or other prefix or an abbreviation thereof,

b) if the recommending voter provided the name of the settlement, the name or type of the public space in a form different from the information recorded in the polling district electoral register, but the address can be established clearly during the verification,

c) if the recommending voter did not include the staircase, floor or door designator in his address, or it differs from the data recorded in the polling district electoral register.