Question 1 enquires whether the criteria set out in Article 3, paragraphs (1)–(13) of the Law for determining the status of a successor political party are objective criteria from the perspective of the right to be elected and the freedom of persons to associate in political parties. In turn, question 2 enquires whether the limitation of the activity of the political party, as a precautionary measure, and the dissolution of the party for the fact that it represents a successor party of a political party declared unconstitutional are justified measures restricting the right to be elected and the freedom of persons to associate in political parties.
